205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-3.47%
Revenue decline while QCOM shows 9.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
0.95%
Cost growth less than half of QCOM's 7.02%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-6.47%
Gross profit decline while QCOM shows 10.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-3.11%
Margin decline while QCOM shows 1.50% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-0.20%
R&D reduction while QCOM shows 1.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.85%
Operating expenses growth less than half of QCOM's 9.31%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
1.27%
Total costs growth less than half of QCOM's 7.96%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-0.76%
Interest expense reduction while QCOM shows 7.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
8.21%
D&A growth above 1.5x QCOM's 4.77%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-7.81%
EBITDA decline while QCOM shows 18.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.50%
EBITDA margin decline while QCOM shows 8.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.39%
Operating income decline while QCOM shows 12.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.21%
Operating margin decline while QCOM shows 3.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.55%
Pre-tax income decline while QCOM shows 13.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.41%
Pre-tax margin decline while QCOM shows 4.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-19.79%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-11.53%
Net income decline while QCOM shows 37.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.35%
Net margin decline while QCOM shows 25.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.81%
EPS decline while QCOM shows 37.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.56%
Diluted EPS decline while QCOM shows 37.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.11%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.11%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.