205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
1.55%
Revenue growth below 50% of QCOM's 13.91%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
3.72%
Cost growth less than half of QCOM's 15.54%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-0.04%
Gross profit decline while QCOM shows 12.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-1.57%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
5.30%
R&D growth while QCOM reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.55%
Operating expenses growth while QCOM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
4.37%
Total costs growth 50-75% of QCOM's 5.90%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
-1.54%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
2.07%
D&A growth while QCOM reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-3.95%
EBITDA decline while QCOM shows 31.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.41%
EBITDA margin decline while QCOM shows 15.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.85%
Operating income decline while QCOM shows 37.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.31%
Operating margin decline while QCOM shows 20.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-166.67%
Other expenses reduction while QCOM shows 471.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-6.11%
Pre-tax income decline while QCOM shows 40.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.54%
Pre-tax margin decline while QCOM shows 22.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-37.01%
Tax expense reduction while QCOM shows 242.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-2.16%
Net income decline while QCOM shows 8.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.65%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.27%
EPS decline while QCOM shows 9.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.54%
Diluted EPS decline while QCOM shows 9.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.22%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.33%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.