205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.53%
Positive growth while QRVO shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
8.23%
Cost growth above 1.5x QRVO's 2.36%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-4.88%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-9.86%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.94%
Operating expenses growth while QRVO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
6.99%
Total costs growth while QRVO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
50.00%
D&A growth while QRVO reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-133.33%
EBITDA decline while QRVO shows 6.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-131.59%
EBITDA margin decline while QRVO shows 13.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-115.79%
Operating income decline while QRVO shows 6.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-114.96%
Operating margin decline while QRVO shows 13.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-200.00%
Other expenses reduction while QRVO shows 112.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-133.33%
Pre-tax income decline while QRVO shows 108.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-131.59%
Pre-tax margin decline while QRVO shows 121.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-85.71%
Tax expense reduction while QRVO shows 62.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-163.64%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-160.30%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-220.00%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-220.00%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.25%
Share count increase while QRVO reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.25%
Diluted share increase while QRVO reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.