205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.02%
Positive growth while QRVO shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-35.60%
Cost reduction while QRVO shows 2.36% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
134.81%
Positive growth while QRVO shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
123.59%
Margin expansion while QRVO shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
182.39%
Operating expenses growth while QRVO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
5.52%
Total costs growth while QRVO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.59%
EBITDA decline while QRVO shows 6.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.24%
EBITDA margin decline while QRVO shows 13.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.59%
Operating income decline while QRVO shows 6.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.24%
Operating margin decline while QRVO shows 13.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
89.29%
Similar other expenses growth to QRVO's 112.30%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
25.00%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of QRVO's 108.14%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
19.02%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of QRVO's 121.03%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.45%
Tax expense growth less than half of QRVO's 62.27%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
35.09%
Net income growth while QRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
28.63%
Net margin growth while QRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
25.00%
EPS growth while QRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
25.00%
Diluted EPS growth while QRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
19.32%
Share count increase while QRVO reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
19.32%
Diluted share increase while QRVO reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.