205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
2.49%
Positive growth while QRVO shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
0.84%
Cost growth less than half of QRVO's 2.36%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
6.95%
Positive growth while QRVO shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
4.35%
Margin expansion while QRVO shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.17%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-0.98%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
200.00%
D&A growth while QRVO reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
39.71%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x QRVO's 6.61%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
36.32%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x QRVO's 13.21%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
39.71%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x QRVO's 6.61%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
36.32%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x QRVO's 13.21%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-200.00%
Other expenses reduction while QRVO shows 112.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
35.78%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of QRVO's 108.14%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
32.48%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of QRVO's 121.03%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
32.86%
Tax expense growth 50-75% of QRVO's 62.27%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
37.31%
Net income growth while QRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
33.98%
Net margin growth while QRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
33.33%
EPS growth while QRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
33.33%
Diluted EPS growth while QRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.82%
Share count increase while QRVO reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.55%
Diluted share increase while QRVO reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.