205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.78%
Positive growth while QRVO shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
8.10%
Cost growth above 1.5x QRVO's 2.36%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
1.19%
Positive growth while QRVO shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-4.33%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
2.79%
R&D growth while QRVO reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.06%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
5.40%
Total costs growth while QRVO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
70.00%
D&A growth while QRVO reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
12.53%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x QRVO's 6.61%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
6.39%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of QRVO's 13.21%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
8.44%
Operating income growth 1.25-1.5x QRVO's 6.61%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
2.52%
Operating margin growth below 50% of QRVO's 13.21%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-185.71%
Other expenses reduction while QRVO shows 112.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
5.12%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of QRVO's 108.14%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.62%
Pre-tax margin decline while QRVO shows 121.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
7.58%
Tax expense growth less than half of QRVO's 62.27%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
3.96%
Net income growth while QRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.72%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
5.56%
EPS growth while QRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
5.56%
Diluted EPS growth while QRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.59%
Share count increase while QRVO reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.84%
Diluted share increase while QRVO reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.