205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-10.32%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-8.84%
Cost reduction while QRVO shows 2.36% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-13.87%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.96%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.29%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.47%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-6.72%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
85.45%
D&A growth while QRVO reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-72.60%
EBITDA decline while QRVO shows 6.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-69.45%
EBITDA margin decline while QRVO shows 13.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-51.78%
Operating income decline while QRVO shows 6.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-46.23%
Operating margin decline while QRVO shows 13.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-106.82%
Other expenses reduction while QRVO shows 112.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-61.67%
Pre-tax income decline while QRVO shows 108.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-57.26%
Pre-tax margin decline while QRVO shows 121.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-79.22%
Tax expense reduction while QRVO shows 62.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-53.37%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-48.01%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-49.18%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-49.18%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.03%
Share count increase while QRVO reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.23%
Diluted share increase while QRVO reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.