205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.33%
Positive growth while QRVO shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
1.22%
Cost growth 50-75% of QRVO's 2.36%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainable cost advantages.
-1.92%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.25%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
90.64%
R&D growth while QRVO reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.03%
Operating expenses growth while QRVO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
9.54%
Total costs growth while QRVO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-87.50%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-542.50%
EBITDA decline while QRVO shows 6.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-541.03%
EBITDA margin decline while QRVO shows 13.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-231.58%
Operating income decline while QRVO shows 6.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-231.14%
Operating margin decline while QRVO shows 13.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-166.67%
Other expenses reduction while QRVO shows 112.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-244.57%
Pre-tax income decline while QRVO shows 108.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-244.08%
Pre-tax margin decline while QRVO shows 121.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.25%
Tax expense reduction while QRVO shows 62.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-293.42%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-292.78%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-274.42%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-274.42%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.10%
Share count increase while QRVO reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
-2.51%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.