205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-0.91%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-4.02%
Cost reduction while QRVO shows 2.36% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
6.12%
Positive growth while QRVO shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
7.10%
Margin expansion while QRVO shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-6.71%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.26%
Operating expenses growth while QRVO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-0.18%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-136.84%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-136.71%
EBITDA decline while QRVO shows 6.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-138.89%
EBITDA margin decline while QRVO shows 13.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-72.73%
Operating income decline while QRVO shows 6.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-74.32%
Operating margin decline while QRVO shows 13.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
164.10%
Other expenses growth 1.25-1.5x QRVO's 112.30%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize cost items.
282.35%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x QRVO's 108.14%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
285.88%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x QRVO's 121.03%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
266.67%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x QRVO's 62.27%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
372.73%
Net income growth while QRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
377.09%
Net margin growth while QRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
200.00%
EPS growth while QRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
200.00%
Diluted EPS growth while QRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.25%
Share count increase while QRVO reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.48%
Diluted share increase while QRVO reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.