205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
13.12%
Positive growth while QRVO shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
5.28%
Cost growth above 1.5x QRVO's 2.36%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
16.17%
Positive growth while QRVO shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
2.69%
Margin expansion while QRVO shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-3.71%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
8.96%
Operating expenses growth while QRVO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
6.62%
Total costs growth while QRVO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.68%
D&A growth while QRVO reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
42.76%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x QRVO's 6.61%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
26.19%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x QRVO's 13.21%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
12.17%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x QRVO's 6.61%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-0.84%
Operating margin decline while QRVO shows 13.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-39.86%
Other expenses reduction while QRVO shows 112.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
0.68%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of QRVO's 108.14%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-11.00%
Pre-tax margin decline while QRVO shows 121.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-28.72%
Tax expense reduction while QRVO shows 62.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
13.43%
Net income growth while QRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.27%
Net margin growth while QRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.33%
EPS growth while QRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.70%
Diluted EPS growth while QRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.53%
Share count increase while QRVO reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.38%
Diluted share increase while QRVO reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.