205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
11.15%
Positive growth while QRVO shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
10.63%
Cost growth above 1.5x QRVO's 2.36%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
8.67%
Positive growth while QRVO shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-2.23%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
33.25%
R&D growth while QRVO reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
23.10%
Operating expenses growth while QRVO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
14.69%
Total costs growth while QRVO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
57.87%
D&A growth while QRVO reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
95.13%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x QRVO's 6.61%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
95.61%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x QRVO's 13.21%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-14.93%
Operating income decline while QRVO shows 6.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-23.46%
Operating margin decline while QRVO shows 13.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-58.67%
Other expenses reduction while QRVO shows 112.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-45.31%
Pre-tax income decline while QRVO shows 108.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-50.79%
Pre-tax margin decline while QRVO shows 121.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-40.36%
Tax expense reduction while QRVO shows 62.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-47.61%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-52.86%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-48.68%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-47.22%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.47%
Share count increase while QRVO reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
-4.07%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.