205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
3.98%
Positive growth while QRVO shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
8.19%
Cost growth above 1.5x QRVO's 2.36%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-2.45%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6.19%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
2.72%
R&D growth while QRVO reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.57%
Operating expenses growth while QRVO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
6.58%
Total costs growth while QRVO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.24%
D&A growth while QRVO reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-7.84%
EBITDA decline while QRVO shows 6.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.37%
EBITDA margin decline while QRVO shows 13.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-29.68%
Operating income decline while QRVO shows 6.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-32.37%
Operating margin decline while QRVO shows 13.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
213.16%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x QRVO's 112.30%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
29.91%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of QRVO's 108.14%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
24.94%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of QRVO's 121.03%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-263.64%
Tax expense reduction while QRVO shows 62.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
97.89%
Net income growth while QRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
90.32%
Net margin growth while QRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
120.00%
EPS growth while QRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
120.00%
Diluted EPS growth while QRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-10.05%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-10.05%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.