205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.28%
Positive growth while QRVO shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
0.06%
Cost growth less than half of QRVO's 2.36%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
0.54%
Positive growth while QRVO shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
0.26%
Margin expansion while QRVO shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-6.03%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.41%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-2.11%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.14%
D&A growth while QRVO reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
7.91%
EBITDA growth 1.25-1.5x QRVO's 6.61%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
7.61%
EBITDA margin growth 50-75% of QRVO's 13.21%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
10.98%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x QRVO's 6.61%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
10.67%
Similar operating margin growth to QRVO's 13.21%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
93.33%
Similar other expenses growth to QRVO's 112.30%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
14.95%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of QRVO's 108.14%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
14.63%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of QRVO's 121.03%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-16.02%
Tax expense reduction while QRVO shows 62.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
27.66%
Net income growth while QRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
27.31%
Net margin growth while QRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
32.00%
EPS growth while QRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
28.00%
Diluted EPS growth while QRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.93%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.28%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.