205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
1.73%
Positive growth while QRVO shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
2.18%
Similar cost growth to QRVO's 2.36%. Walter Schloss would investigate if industry cost pressures are temporary.
1.31%
Positive growth while QRVO shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-0.41%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
6.34%
R&D growth while QRVO reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.03%
Operating expenses growth while QRVO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.17%
Total costs growth while QRVO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.29%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-2.14%
EBITDA decline while QRVO shows 6.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.80%
EBITDA margin decline while QRVO shows 13.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.41%
Operating income decline while QRVO shows 6.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.07%
Operating margin decline while QRVO shows 13.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-37.21%
Other expenses reduction while QRVO shows 112.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-5.29%
Pre-tax income decline while QRVO shows 108.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.91%
Pre-tax margin decline while QRVO shows 121.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.67%
Tax expense reduction while QRVO shows 62.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-70.59%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-71.09%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-69.48%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-69.33%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.03%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-3.09%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.