205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
1.07%
Positive growth while QRVO shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
8.86%
Cost growth above 1.5x QRVO's 2.36%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-6.06%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-7.06%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
3.89%
R&D growth while QRVO reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.07%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
4.88%
Total costs growth while QRVO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.96%
D&A growth while QRVO reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-7.54%
EBITDA decline while QRVO shows 6.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.52%
EBITDA margin decline while QRVO shows 13.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.44%
Operating income decline while QRVO shows 6.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.40%
Operating margin decline while QRVO shows 13.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-41.18%
Other expenses reduction while QRVO shows 112.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-11.06%
Pre-tax income decline while QRVO shows 108.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-12.00%
Pre-tax margin decline while QRVO shows 121.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-26.34%
Tax expense reduction while QRVO shows 62.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-4.25%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.27%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.44%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.27%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.21%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-1.72%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.