205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-5.75%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-2.70%
Cost reduction while QRVO shows 2.36% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-8.29%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.69%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6.00%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3650.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-21.18%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-8.67%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.25%
D&A growth while QRVO reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.55%
EBITDA growth below 50% of QRVO's 6.61%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.68%
EBITDA margin growth 50-75% of QRVO's 13.21%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
0.24%
Operating income growth below 50% of QRVO's 6.61%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.36%
Operating margin growth below 50% of QRVO's 13.21%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
125.00%
Other expenses growth 1.1-1.25x QRVO's 112.30%. Bill Ackman would demand expense justification.
1.05%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of QRVO's 108.14%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
7.22%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of QRVO's 121.03%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-18.62%
Tax expense reduction while QRVO shows 62.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
9.66%
Net income growth while QRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
16.35%
Net margin growth while QRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
11.27%
EPS growth while QRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.45%
Diluted EPS growth while QRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.01%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.59%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.