205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
1.95%
Positive growth while QRVO shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
2.46%
Similar cost growth to QRVO's 2.36%. Walter Schloss would investigate if industry cost pressures are temporary.
1.45%
Positive growth while QRVO shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-0.49%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.47%
R&D growth while QRVO reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
550.00%
Other expenses growth while QRVO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.41%
Operating expenses growth while QRVO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.78%
Total costs growth while QRVO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.16%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-0.70%
EBITDA decline while QRVO shows 6.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.59%
EBITDA margin decline while QRVO shows 13.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.33%
Operating income decline while QRVO shows 6.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.23%
Operating margin decline while QRVO shows 13.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-60.00%
Other expenses reduction while QRVO shows 112.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-0.98%
Pre-tax income decline while QRVO shows 108.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.87%
Pre-tax margin decline while QRVO shows 121.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.95%
Tax expense reduction while QRVO shows 62.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
0.90%
Net income growth while QRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.02%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.79%
EPS growth while QRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1.82%
Diluted EPS growth while QRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.94%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-1.17%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.