205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
6.47%
Revenue growth below 50% of QRVO's 29.35%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
-0.81%
Cost reduction while QRVO shows 28.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
13.31%
Gross profit growth below 50% of QRVO's 30.47%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.43%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x QRVO's 0.87%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-5.40%
R&D reduction while QRVO shows 10.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
152.04%
Other expenses change of 152.04% while QRVO maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
40.81%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x QRVO's 3.69%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
12.10%
Total costs growth less than half of QRVO's 308.08%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.95%
D&A growth less than half of QRVO's 18.61%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-5.05%
EBITDA decline while QRVO shows 390.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.82%
EBITDA margin decline while QRVO shows 279.36% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.84%
Operating income decline while QRVO shows 167.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-12.50%
Operating margin decline while QRVO shows 152.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-16.67%
Other expenses reduction while QRVO shows 21.72% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-7.48%
Pre-tax income decline while QRVO shows 134.28% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-13.10%
Pre-tax margin decline while QRVO shows 126.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-15.77%
Tax expense reduction while QRVO shows 79.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-4.70%
Net income decline while QRVO shows 91.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.48%
Net margin decline while QRVO shows 93.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.08%
EPS decline while QRVO shows 83.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.45%
Diluted EPS decline while QRVO shows 91.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.63%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.54%
Diluted share reduction while QRVO shows 0.51% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.