205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-6.66%
Revenue decline while QRVO shows 3.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-5.26%
Cost reduction while QRVO shows 1.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-7.81%
Gross profit decline while QRVO shows 8.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-1.24%
Margin decline while QRVO shows 4.52% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-5.98%
R&D reduction while QRVO shows 4.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
43.14%
Other expenses change of 43.14% while QRVO maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
1.93%
Operating expenses growth less than half of QRVO's 15.35%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-2.46%
Total costs reduction while QRVO shows 5.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.87%
D&A growth above 1.5x QRVO's 5.37%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-6.95%
EBITDA decline while QRVO shows 22.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.32%
EBITDA margin decline while QRVO shows 17.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-18.60%
Operating income decline while QRVO shows 66.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-12.80%
Operating margin decline while QRVO shows 60.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
82.14%
Other expenses growth while QRVO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-16.42%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.46%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-8.56%
Tax expense reduction while QRVO shows 152.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-18.76%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-12.96%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-17.86%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-17.86%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.91%
Share count reduction while QRVO shows 83.53% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.81%
Diluted share reduction while QRVO shows 0.03% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.