205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-1.49%
Revenue decline while QRVO shows 4.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-0.86%
Cost reduction while QRVO shows 6.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-2.01%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.53%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
5.78%
R&D growth while QRVO reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-50.68%
Other expenses reduction while QRVO shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-3.78%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-2.05%
Total costs reduction while QRVO shows 3.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
4.17%
Interest expense change of 4.17% while QRVO maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
-17.99%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-7.20%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.80%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.44%
Operating income growth while QRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1.95%
Operating margin growth while QRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-280.00%
Other expenses reduction while QRVO shows 91.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-1.61%
Pre-tax income decline while QRVO shows 332.12% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.13%
Pre-tax margin decline while QRVO shows 322.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
7.60%
Tax expense growth while QRVO reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-4.70%
Net income decline while QRVO shows 109.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.26%
Net margin decline while QRVO shows 109.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.35%
EPS decline while QRVO shows 109.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.35%
Diluted EPS decline while QRVO shows 109.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.46%
Share count reduction while QRVO shows 6.02% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.54%
Diluted share reduction while QRVO shows 2.68% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.