205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-3.64%
Revenue decline while QRVO shows 23.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-2.91%
Cost reduction while QRVO shows 11.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-4.17%
Gross profit decline while QRVO shows 43.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-0.55%
Margin decline while QRVO shows 15.97% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
8.68%
R&D growth while QRVO reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
47.27%
Other expenses growth while QRVO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
7.92%
Operating expenses growth while QRVO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.06%
Total costs growth less than half of QRVO's 5.09%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.95%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-11.03%
EBITDA decline while QRVO shows 43.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.67%
EBITDA margin decline while QRVO shows 45.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-12.91%
Operating income decline while QRVO shows 7454.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.62%
Operating margin decline while QRVO shows 6052.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-38.46%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-13.52%
Pre-tax income decline while QRVO shows 4088.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.26%
Pre-tax margin decline while QRVO shows 3327.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
8.40%
Tax expense growth less than half of QRVO's 6905.50%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-20.48%
Net income decline while QRVO shows 3794.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-17.48%
Net margin decline while QRVO shows 3090.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-19.48%
EPS decline while QRVO shows 3814.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-19.74%
Diluted EPS decline while QRVO shows 3814.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.21%
Share count reduction while QRVO shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.19%
Diluted share reduction while QRVO shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.