205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
12.28%
Positive growth while QRVO shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
9.84%
Cost increase while QRVO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
13.83%
Positive growth while QRVO shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
1.38%
Margin expansion while QRVO shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
3.52%
R&D growth while QRVO reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.84%
Total costs growth while QRVO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-14.29%
Interest expense reduction while QRVO shows 1061.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1.28%
D&A growth less than half of QRVO's 5.32%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
19.85%
EBITDA growth while QRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6.74%
EBITDA margin growth while QRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
24.89%
Operating income growth while QRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
11.23%
Operating margin growth while QRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6.67%
Other expenses growth while QRVO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
25.32%
Pre-tax income growth while QRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
11.61%
Pre-tax margin growth while QRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
28.27%
Tax expense growth while QRVO reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
18.19%
Net income growth while QRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
5.26%
Net margin growth while QRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
23.46%
EPS growth while QRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
24.05%
Diluted EPS growth while QRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.22%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
0.10%
Diluted share increase while QRVO reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.