205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-7.10%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-8.17%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-6.45%
Gross profit decline while QRVO shows 10.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
0.70%
Margin expansion below 50% of QRVO's 12.33%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.83%
R&D reduction while QRVO shows 1.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-25.93%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-7.08%
Operating expenses reduction while QRVO shows 0.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-7.59%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
5.56%
Interest expense growth less than half of QRVO's 88.32%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-4.22%
D&A reduction while QRVO shows 1008.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
6.54%
EBITDA growth below 50% of QRVO's 1461.12%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
14.69%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of QRVO's 165.49%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-5.45%
Operating income decline while QRVO shows 164.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.78%
Operating margin growth below 50% of QRVO's 165.49%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1371.43%
Other expenses growth while QRVO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
8.40%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of QRVO's 87.04%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
16.69%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of QRVO's 86.77%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
23.97%
Tax expense growth less than half of QRVO's 317.55%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
8.16%
Net income growth while QRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
16.43%
Net margin growth while QRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
4.00%
EPS growth while QRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
4.08%
Diluted EPS growth while QRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.51%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
0.10%
Diluted share increase while QRVO reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.