205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-8.89%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-10.27%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-8.13%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.83%
Margin expansion while QRVO shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
2.93%
Similar R&D growth to QRVO's 3.32%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry innovation requirements.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.23%
Other expenses growth less than half of QRVO's 135.44%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
1.04%
Operating expenses growth less than half of QRVO's 2.72%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-6.06%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
10.53%
Interest expense growth while QRVO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-0.44%
D&A reduction while QRVO shows 882.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-11.71%
EBITDA decline while QRVO shows 122.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.09%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-12.58%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.05%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1400.00%
Other expenses reduction while QRVO shows 23.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-13.36%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.90%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
139.29%
Tax expense growth while QRVO reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-73.23%
Net income decline while QRVO shows 171.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-70.62%
Net margin decline while QRVO shows 191.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-72.87%
EPS decline while QRVO shows 170.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-73.02%
Diluted EPS decline while QRVO shows 169.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.30%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.10%
Diluted share reduction while QRVO shows 3.27% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.