205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-0.63%
Revenue decline while QRVO shows 13.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-0.96%
Cost reduction while QRVO shows 16.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-0.43%
Gross profit decline while QRVO shows 10.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
0.20%
Margin expansion while QRVO shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-2.33%
R&D reduction while QRVO shows 5.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.47%
Operating expenses reduction while QRVO shows 18.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-0.76%
Total costs reduction while QRVO shows 16.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.13%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.51%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.40%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.23%
Operating margin growth while QRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-350.00%
Other expenses reduction while QRVO shows 27.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-2.63%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.01%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-73.26%
Tax expense reduction while QRVO shows 149.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
9.72%
Net income growth while QRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
10.41%
Net margin growth while QRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
10.53%
EPS growth while QRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
10.71%
Diluted EPS growth while QRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.21%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.53%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.