205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
6.79%
Positive growth while QRVO shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
4.84%
Cost increase while QRVO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
7.87%
Positive growth while QRVO shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
1.01%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x QRVO's 0.63%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
0.52%
R&D growth less than half of QRVO's 3.40%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.84%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-1.30%
Operating expenses reduction while QRVO shows 8.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
2.49%
Total costs growth while QRVO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-2.04%
Interest expense reduction while QRVO shows 12.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-2.80%
D&A reduction while QRVO shows 1.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
17.60%
EBITDA growth while QRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
10.13%
EBITDA margin growth while QRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
12.68%
Operating income growth while QRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
5.52%
Operating margin growth while QRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
618.18%
Other expenses growth while QRVO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
21.42%
Pre-tax income growth while QRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
13.71%
Pre-tax margin growth while QRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.14%
Tax expense growth while QRVO reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
24.76%
Net income growth while QRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
16.83%
Net margin growth while QRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
24.49%
EPS growth while QRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
24.14%
Diluted EPS growth while QRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.22%
Share count increase while QRVO reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.32%
Diluted share increase while QRVO reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.