205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.56%
Positive growth while QRVO shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
2.33%
Cost increase while QRVO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-0.22%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.77%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
4.11%
R&D growth while QRVO reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.67%
Other expenses growth less than half of QRVO's 229.09%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
4.10%
Operating expenses growth while QRVO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.97%
Total costs growth while QRVO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
8.16%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x QRVO's 0.01%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
9.17%
D&A growth above 1.5x QRVO's 3.29%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
0.10%
EBITDA growth while QRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.45%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.65%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.20%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
52.38%
Other expenses growth while QRVO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-0.86%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.41%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6.92%
Tax expense reduction while QRVO shows 105.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
0.17%
Net income growth while QRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.38%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.21%
EPS growth while QRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.82%
Diluted EPS growth while QRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.76%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.75%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.