205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-10.89%
Revenue decline while QRVO shows 4.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-2.52%
Cost reduction while QRVO shows 5.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-14.65%
Gross profit decline while QRVO shows 4.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-4.22%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.70%
R&D growth less than half of QRVO's 2.79%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-37.66%
Other expenses reduction while QRVO shows 264.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-2.98%
Operating expenses reduction while QRVO shows 18.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-2.69%
Total costs reduction while QRVO shows 9.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
13.21%
Similar interest expense growth to QRVO's 13.47%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
0.38%
D&A growth while QRVO reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-16.25%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6.01%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-18.75%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-8.81%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
55.00%
Other expenses growth while QRVO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-18.47%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-8.50%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-43.53%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-14.51%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.06%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-13.94%
EPS decline while QRVO shows 1.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-13.77%
Diluted EPS decline while QRVO shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.77%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.76%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.