205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-10.20%
Revenue decline while QRVO shows 2.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-4.86%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-13.82%
Gross profit decline while QRVO shows 99.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-4.03%
Margin decline while QRVO shows 94.03% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
3.91%
R&D growth while QRVO reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.91%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-6.64%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
18.37%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x QRVO's 0.12%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
7.42%
D&A growth while QRVO reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-10.69%
EBITDA decline while QRVO shows 147.72% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.54%
EBITDA margin decline while QRVO shows 81.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-16.11%
Operating income decline while QRVO shows 74.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.58%
Operating margin decline while QRVO shows 75.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-53.33%
Other expenses reduction while QRVO shows 97.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-16.47%
Pre-tax income decline while QRVO shows 74.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.98%
Pre-tax margin decline while QRVO shows 74.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
6.21%
Tax expense growth less than half of QRVO's 86.63%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-19.40%
Net income decline while QRVO shows 68.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.24%
Net margin decline while QRVO shows 69.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-19.33%
EPS decline while QRVO shows 68.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-19.46%
Diluted EPS decline while QRVO shows 68.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.22%
Share count increase while QRVO reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.22%
Diluted share increase while QRVO reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.