205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
8.61%
Positive growth while QRVO shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
4.10%
Cost growth less than half of QRVO's 11.76%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
11.90%
Positive growth while QRVO shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
3.03%
Margin expansion while QRVO shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-1.20%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.47%
Operating expenses reduction while QRVO shows 26.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
0.89%
Total costs growth less than half of QRVO's 17.16%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.51%
D&A growth less than half of QRVO's 1413.39%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
18.65%
EBITDA growth while QRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
9.24%
EBITDA margin growth while QRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
24.52%
Operating income growth while QRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
14.65%
Operating margin growth while QRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
100.00%
Other expenses growth 1.1-1.25x QRVO's 81.34%. Bill Ackman would demand expense justification.
24.62%
Pre-tax income growth while QRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
14.74%
Pre-tax margin growth while QRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
60.00%
Tax expense growth 50-75% of QRVO's 97.70%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
20.85%
Net income growth while QRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
11.27%
Net margin growth while QRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
20.33%
EPS growth while QRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
20.49%
Diluted EPS growth while QRVO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.11%
Share count increase while QRVO reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.11%
Diluted share increase while QRVO reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.