PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Highlights the firm's ability to meet near-term obligations and cover interest expenses. For conservative value investors, strong liquidity and coverage metrics are critical to avoid distress or forced dilution.
4.62
Similar to MRVL's ratio of 4.20. Walter Schloss would see both operating with a similar safety margin.
3.53
Similar ratio to MRVL's 3.87. Walter Schloss might see both running close to industry norms.
0.92
0.5–0.75x MRVL's 1.34. Martin Whitman would question if short-term obligations are too high relative to cash.
67.30
Coverage below 0.5x MRVL's 1938.98. Michael Burry might foresee difficulties in meeting interest obligations if turbulence hits.
2.22
Short-term coverage of 2.22 while MRVL has zero coverage. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if our cash flow management provides advantages.