205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
-2.37%
Negative ROE while QCOM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate capital misallocation or uncompetitive positioning.
-1.11%
Negative ROA while QCOM stands at 0.00%. John Neff would check for structural inefficiencies or mispriced assets.
-1.12%
Both companies show negative ROCE. Martin Whitman would investigate if external factors hamper profitability.
48.21%
Gross margin below 50% of QCOM's 100.00%. Michael Burry would watch for cost or pricing crises.
-2.27%
Both companies are negative at the operating level. Martin Whitman would see if the entire niche faces fundamental challenges.
-3.18%
Negative net margin while QCOM has 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would check if uncompetitive pricing or bloated costs cause losses.