205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
-5.27%
Negative ROE while QCOM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate capital misallocation or uncompetitive positioning.
-2.22%
Negative ROA while QCOM stands at 0.00%. John Neff would check for structural inefficiencies or mispriced assets.
-1.68%
Negative ROCE while QCOM is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for capital misallocation or cyclical downturn.
16.13%
Gross margin below 50% of QCOM's 100.00%. Michael Burry would watch for cost or pricing crises.
-3.59%
Negative operating margin while QCOM has 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand urgent improvements in cost or revenue.
-6.65%
Negative net margin while QCOM has 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would check if uncompetitive pricing or bloated costs cause losses.