205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
-4.82%
Negative ROE while QCOM stands at 2.94%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate capital misallocation or uncompetitive positioning.
-2.63%
Negative ROA while QCOM stands at 1.32%. John Neff would check for structural inefficiencies or mispriced assets.
-2.39%
Negative ROCE while QCOM is at 2.10%. Joel Greenblatt would look for capital misallocation or cyclical downturn.
39.04%
Gross margin 1.25-1.5x QCOM's 30.14%. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if this advantage is sustainable.
-8.24%
Negative operating margin while QCOM has 5.96%. Joel Greenblatt would demand urgent improvements in cost or revenue.
-11.74%
Negative net margin while QCOM has 5.01%. Joel Greenblatt would check if uncompetitive pricing or bloated costs cause losses.