205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
-1.56%
Negative ROE while QCOM stands at 2.84%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate capital misallocation or uncompetitive positioning.
-1.18%
Negative ROA while QCOM stands at 2.53%. John Neff would check for structural inefficiencies or mispriced assets.
-1.98%
Negative ROCE while QCOM is at 3.86%. Joel Greenblatt would look for capital misallocation or cyclical downturn.
25.23%
Gross margin below 50% of QCOM's 64.46%. Michael Burry would watch for cost or pricing crises.
-14.63%
Negative operating margin while QCOM has 29.58%. Joel Greenblatt would demand urgent improvements in cost or revenue.
-9.67%
Negative net margin while QCOM has 20.90%. Joel Greenblatt would check if uncompetitive pricing or bloated costs cause losses.