205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
-5.49%
Negative ROE while QCOM stands at 3.53%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate capital misallocation or uncompetitive positioning.
-4.01%
Negative ROA while QCOM stands at 2.92%. John Neff would check for structural inefficiencies or mispriced assets.
0.53%
ROCE below 50% of QCOM's 4.33%. Michael Burry would question the viability of the firm’s strategy.
35.83%
Gross margin 50-75% of QCOM's 64.29%. Martin Whitman would worry about a persistent competitive disadvantage.
3.12%
Operating margin below 50% of QCOM's 28.92%. Michael Burry would investigate whether this signals deeper issues.
-27.45%
Negative net margin while QCOM has 21.77%. Joel Greenblatt would check if uncompetitive pricing or bloated costs cause losses.