205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
4.93
P/E less than half of MRVL's 40.88. Charlie Munger would verify if competitive advantages justify such a discount.
12.72
P/S less than half of MRVL's 32.38. Joel Greenblatt would verify if margins support this discount.
3.68
Similar P/B to MRVL's 4.70. Philip Fisher would investigate if similar multiples reflect similar asset efficiency.
177.51
P/FCF 1.25-1.5x MRVL's 136.39. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if premium reflects better growth prospects.
73.62
P/OCF 50-75% of MRVL's 112.74. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if working capital management explains the gap.
3.68
Similar fair value ratio to MRVL's 4.70. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar valuations reflect similar quality.
5.07%
Earnings yield exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 0.61%. David Dodd would verify if earnings quality justifies this premium.
0.56%
FCF yield 75-90% of MRVL's 0.73%. Bill Ackman would demand evidence of superior growth prospects.