PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
-4.31
Negative P/E while QCOM shows 0.00. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability versus competitor.
1.61
P/S less than half of QCOM's 15.94. Joel Greenblatt would verify if margins support this discount.
1.38
P/B of 1.38 while QCOM has zero book value. Bruce Berkowitz would examine asset quality advantage.
-25.31
Negative FCF while QCOM shows P/FCF of 0.00. Joel Greenblatt would examine cash flow improvement potential.
135.42
P/OCF of 135.42 while QCOM has no operating cash flow. Bruce Berkowitz would examine operational advantage.
1.38
Fair value ratio of 1.38 while QCOM has zero value. Bruce Berkowitz would examine valuation methodology.
-5.80%
Negative earnings while QCOM shows yield of 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability.
-3.95%
FCF yield 6-8% - Fair value range. Seth Klarman would verify if yield provides sufficient margin of safety. Check Working Capital efficiency.