PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
-108.21
Negative P/E while QCOM shows 92.91. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability versus competitor.
10.28
Similar P/S to QCOM's 10.37. David Dodd would investigate if similar multiples reflect similar business quality.
2.96
Similar P/B to QCOM's 3.47. Philip Fisher would investigate if similar multiples reflect similar asset efficiency.
20.75
Positive FCF while QCOM shows negative FCF. John Neff would investigate cash generation advantage.
19.00
P/OCF less than half of QCOM's 79.35. David Dodd would verify if operating efficiency justifies this discount.
2.96
Similar fair value ratio to QCOM's 3.47. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar valuations reflect similar quality.
-0.23%
Negative earnings while QCOM shows yield of 0.27%. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability.
4.82%
Positive FCF while QCOM shows negative FCF. John Neff would investigate cash generation advantage.