205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
-15.38
Negative P/E while QCOM shows 37.31. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability versus competitor.
7.22
Similar P/S to QCOM's 7.47. David Dodd would investigate if similar multiples reflect similar business quality.
2.97
P/B 50-75% of QCOM's 4.39. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if asset composition explains the gap.
116.92
P/FCF less than half of QCOM's 792.76. David Dodd would verify if cash flow quality justifies this discount.
37.00
P/OCF 50-75% of QCOM's 58.02. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if working capital management explains the gap.
2.97
Fair value ratio 50-75% of QCOM's 4.39. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if business quality explains the gap.
-1.62%
Negative earnings while QCOM shows yield of 0.67%. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability.
0.86%
FCF yield exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 0.13%. David Dodd would verify if cash flow quality justifies this premium.