PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
-72.50
Negative P/E while QCOM shows 65.18. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability versus competitor.
28.05
P/S 50-75% of QCOM's 54.49. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if sales quality justifies the gap.
4.51
P/B 50-75% of QCOM's 7.41. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if asset composition explains the gap.
234.14
P/FCF 50-75% of QCOM's 386.06. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if capital allocation explains the gap.
97.49
P/OCF less than half of QCOM's 325.80. David Dodd would verify if operating efficiency justifies this discount.
4.51
Fair value ratio 50-75% of QCOM's 7.41. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if business quality explains the gap.
-0.34%
Negative earnings while QCOM shows yield of 0.38%. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability.
0.43%
FCF yield exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 0.26%. David Dodd would verify if cash flow quality justifies this premium.