PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
9.14
P/E less than half of QCOM's 22.42. Charlie Munger would verify if competitive advantages justify such a discount.
8.04
P/S less than half of QCOM's 26.06. Joel Greenblatt would verify if margins support this discount.
2.88
Similar P/B to QCOM's 3.35. Philip Fisher would investigate if similar multiples reflect similar asset efficiency.
100.80
Similar P/FCF to QCOM's 101.32. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar multiples reflect similar business quality.
50.04
P/OCF 50-75% of QCOM's 87.52. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if working capital management explains the gap.
2.88
Similar fair value ratio to QCOM's 3.35. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar valuations reflect similar quality.
2.73%
Earnings yield exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 1.12%. David Dodd would verify if earnings quality justifies this premium.
0.99%
Similar FCF yield to QCOM's 0.99%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar yields reflect similar quality.