PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-0.90%
Negative net income growth while BABA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-13.95%
Negative yoy D&A while BABA is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
209.19%
Deferred tax of 209.19% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-209.19%
Negative yoy SBC while BABA is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-99.54%
Negative yoy working capital usage while BABA is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-219.09%
AR is negative yoy while BABA is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-102.61%
Negative yoy inventory while BABA is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-1284.44%
Negative yoy AP while BABA is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
50.25%
Growth of 50.25% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
352.77%
Some yoy increase while BABA is negative at -97.84%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-2691.67%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with BABA at -61.19%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-23.98%
Negative yoy CapEx while BABA is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
125777.54%
Acquisition growth of 125777.54% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-736.92%
Negative yoy purchasing while BABA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
111.62%
Liquidation growth of 111.62% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-125777.54%
We reduce yoy other investing while BABA is 141.82%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-418.82%
We reduce yoy invests while BABA stands at 64.37%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-57.94%
We cut debt repayment yoy while BABA is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
1206.00%
Issuance growth of 1206.00% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.