PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-31.18%
Negative net income growth while BABA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
2.53%
D&A growth of 2.53% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost difference that must be justified by expansions.
-205.22%
Negative yoy deferred tax while BABA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
205.22%
SBC growth of 205.22% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
121.67%
Working capital change of 121.67% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might affect near-term cash flow.
-131.77%
AR is negative yoy while BABA is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-135.81%
Negative yoy inventory while BABA is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
108.83%
AP growth of 108.83% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
154.43%
Growth of 154.43% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
32.20%
Some yoy increase while BABA is negative at -97.84%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
157.06%
Some CFO growth while BABA is negative at -61.19%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-48.67%
Negative yoy CapEx while BABA is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
50.32%
Purchases growth of 50.32% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-92.53%
We reduce yoy sales while BABA is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while BABA is 141.82%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-499.97%
We reduce yoy invests while BABA stands at 64.37%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
99.59%
Debt repayment growth of 99.59% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
36.26%
Issuance growth of 36.26% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.