PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-4.98%
Negative net income growth while BABA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
20.79%
D&A growth of 20.79% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost difference that must be justified by expansions.
33.33%
Deferred tax of 33.33% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
30.91%
SBC growth of 30.91% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
104.53%
Working capital change of 104.53% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might affect near-term cash flow.
-120.33%
AR is negative yoy while BABA is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-179.88%
Negative yoy inventory while BABA is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
104.30%
AP growth of 104.30% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
1085.19%
Growth of 1085.19% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
-35.57%
Both negative yoy, with BABA at -97.84%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
126.67%
Some CFO growth while BABA is negative at -61.19%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-45.30%
Negative yoy CapEx while BABA is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-237.41%
Negative yoy acquisition while BABA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-86.78%
Negative yoy purchasing while BABA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
4.59%
Liquidation growth of 4.59% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
50.00%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. BABA's 141.82%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
-343.85%
We reduce yoy invests while BABA stands at 64.37%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-26.13%
We cut debt repayment yoy while BABA is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.