PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-67.02%
Negative net income growth while BABA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
13.93%
D&A growth of 13.93% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost difference that must be justified by expansions.
70.00%
Deferred tax of 70.00% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
513.79%
Working capital change of 513.79% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might affect near-term cash flow.
-2.74%
AR is negative yoy while BABA is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-114.23%
Negative yoy inventory while BABA is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
643.86%
AP growth of 643.86% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
8.75%
Growth of 8.75% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
2.66%
Some yoy increase while BABA is negative at -97.84%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
88.42%
Some CFO growth while BABA is negative at -61.19%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-22.17%
Negative yoy CapEx while BABA is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
89.77%
Acquisition growth of 89.77% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
38.04%
Purchases growth of 38.04% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-3.16%
We reduce yoy sales while BABA is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
100.00%
Growth well above BABA's 141.82%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
110.52%
Investing outflow well above BABA's 64.37%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
35.00%
Debt repayment growth of 35.00% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.