PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-485.71%
Negative net income growth while BABA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
10.32%
D&A growth of 10.32% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost difference that must be justified by expansions.
-47.62%
Negative yoy deferred tax while BABA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-5.70%
Negative yoy SBC while BABA is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
322.22%
Working capital change of 322.22% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might affect near-term cash flow.
40.76%
AR growth of 40.76% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
-1853.33%
Negative yoy inventory while BABA is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
1329.87%
AP growth of 1329.87% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
16.28%
Growth of 16.28% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
-38.08%
Both negative yoy, with BABA at -97.84%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
57.73%
Some CFO growth while BABA is negative at -61.19%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-21.40%
Negative yoy CapEx while BABA is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
99.32%
Acquisition growth of 99.32% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
53.46%
Purchases growth of 53.46% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-29.02%
We reduce yoy sales while BABA is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
94.24%
Growth well above BABA's 141.82%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
25.14%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. BABA's 64.37%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
12.07%
Debt repayment growth of 12.07% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.