PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-54.81%
Negative net income growth while BABA stands at 4.49%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
4.88%
Less D&A growth vs. BABA's 45.55%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-69.72%
Negative yoy deferred tax while BABA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-1.53%
Negative yoy SBC while BABA is 76.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-158.14%
Negative yoy working capital usage while BABA is 100.45%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
158.68%
AR growth of 158.68% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
152.56%
Inventory growth of 152.56% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
-191.17%
Negative yoy AP while BABA is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-85.01%
Negative yoy usage while BABA is 100.45%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-7.43%
Negative yoy while BABA is 52.89%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-144.85%
Negative yoy CFO while BABA is 146.68%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-22.73%
Both yoy lines negative, with BABA at -343.06%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
100.00%
Some acquisitions while BABA is negative at -62266.67%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
-4.30%
Negative yoy purchasing while BABA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
15.15%
Liquidation growth of 15.15% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
64.21%
We have some outflow growth while BABA is negative at -20.24%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-9.61%
Both yoy lines negative, with BABA at -1221.97%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-33.70%
Both yoy lines negative, with BABA at -5939.29%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.