PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
261.40%
Some net income increase while BABA is negative at -75.66%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
5.47%
Some D&A expansion while BABA is negative at -8.98%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-2050.00%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
38.33%
Less SBC growth vs. BABA's 180.52%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
153.24%
Slight usage while BABA is negative at -245.53%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-197.51%
AR is negative yoy while BABA is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-103.74%
Negative yoy inventory while BABA is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
108.78%
AP growth of 108.78% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
46.93%
Some yoy usage while BABA is negative at -245.53%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-24.21%
Negative yoy while BABA is 135.88%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
233.22%
Some CFO growth while BABA is negative at -42.37%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-39.27%
Both yoy lines negative, with BABA at -159.83%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
97.81%
Acquisition spending well above BABA's 55.04%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
36.61%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. BABA's 100.00%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
25.33%
We have some liquidation growth while BABA is negative at -100.00%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
74.63%
We have some outflow growth while BABA is negative at -18087.15%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
25.50%
We have mild expansions while BABA is negative at -212.73%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
3.15%
Debt repayment well below BABA's 100.00%. Michael Burry suspects heavier leverage risk or insufficient cash generation to keep pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.