PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
226.29 - 230.79
161.38 - 242.52
38.50M / 42.21M (Avg.)
34.73 | 6.57
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-14.13%
Negative net income growth while BABA stands at 96.04%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
6.32%
D&A growth well above BABA's 2.68%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-46.51%
Negative yoy deferred tax while BABA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-3.37%
Negative yoy SBC while BABA is 43.29%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
54.31%
Well above BABA's 100.00% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-36.74%
AR is negative yoy while BABA is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-5592.59%
Negative yoy inventory while BABA is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
444.24%
AP growth of 444.24% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
51.58%
Growth well above BABA's 100.00%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-5.60%
Negative yoy while BABA is 474.27%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
30.70%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of BABA's 230.91%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
1.48%
Lower CapEx growth vs. BABA's 100.00%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
-1212.50%
Negative yoy acquisition while BABA stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-79.52%
Negative yoy purchasing while BABA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
122.34%
Liquidation growth of 122.34% while BABA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
50.32%
Growth well above BABA's 85.20%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-0.07%
We reduce yoy invests while BABA stands at 85.20%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-3.37%
We cut debt repayment yoy while BABA is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.